FujitsuメーカーPRIMERGY TX150 Torreの使用説明書/サービス説明書
ページ先へ移動 of 33
Version 5.1 November 2008 Pages 33 Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Abstract This document contains a su mmary of the benchmarks executed for the PRIMERGY TX150 S6. The PRIMERGY TX150 S6 performance d ata are compared with the data of other PRIMERGY models and discussed.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Technical Data The PRIMERGY TX150 S6 is a mono -sock et tower server. It includes the Intel 3210 chipset, one Celer on,.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 SPECcpu2006 ∗ Benchmark description SPECcpu2006 is a benchmark to measure s ystem efficiency duri ng integer and floating p oint operations.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 • Xeon E3110 a nd E3120 (Wolfdale, 2 cores per chip, 6 MB L2 cache per chip) • Xeon X3210 and X3220 (Kentsfield, 4 .
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 The measured SPECint_rate_ 2006 results are 12-17 % a bove the SPECint_rate_bas e2006 results. Processor cores/ chip GHz L2 cache FSB TDP SPECfp_rate_base2006 SPECfp_rate2006 Celeron 440 1 2 ½ MB per chip 800 MHz 35 watt 12.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 The measured SPECfp_rate_ 2006 results ar e 4-9% above the SPECfp_rat e_base 2006 results. The following four tables show results, in which all benchmark progr ams were compiled with the Intel C++ /Fortran com- piler 10.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark environment All SPECcpu2006 measurem ents were performed on a PRIMERGY T X150 S6 with the following har dware.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 SPECjbb2005 ∗ Benchmark description SPECjbb2005 is a Java busin ess benchmark that focuses on the per formance of Java server pl atforms.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark results In November 2007 the PRIMERGY TX150 S6 was measured with the Xeon X321 0 processor and a memory of 8 GB PC2-6400 DDR2-SDRAM. The me asurement was taken under W indo ws Server 2003 R 2 Enterprise x64 Edition SP 1.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 In August 2008 the PRIMERGY TX150 S6 was measure d with the Xeon X3 370 processor an d a memory of 8 GB PC2- 6400 DDR2-SDRAM. T he measurement was taken under Windows Server 2003 R 2 Enterprise x64 E dition.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark environment The SPECjbb2005 measurem ents were performed on a PRIMERGY TX150 S6 with the follo wing hardware .
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 SPECpower_ssj2008 * Benchmark description SPECpower_ssj2008 is the first industr y-standard SPEC benc hmark that evaluates the po wer and performance charac- teristics of server class computers.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark results In June 2008 the PRIMERGY T X150 S6 was measured with an Intel Xeon X3360 processor and 4 GB of PC2-6400E DDR2-SDRAM memory. T he measurement was taken u nder Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterpr ise x64 Edition and a JRockit(R) 6.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 The Xeon pro cessor comparison dia gram shows measurement s with four different Xeon CPUs measured with the PRIMERGY TX150 S6. All other configuration deta ils rem ained unchanged dur ing the measurements.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 As you can see in the diagram above not only the right choice of pr ocessors has a s ignificant influence on p ower con- sumption but other configuration d etails as well.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 As you can see the most energy efficient configur ation does not c onsume the lo west power. It is still about 108% m ore efficient compared to the leas t energy efficient configuratio n.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 SPECweb2005 ∗ Benchmark description SPECweb2005 is the next g eneration web server be nchmar k developed by the Open S ystems Group (OSG) of the Standard Performance Evalua tion Corporation (SPEC).
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark results In April 2008 the PRIMERGY T X150 S6 was measured with o ne Xeon X322 0 processor and 8 GB PC2-6400 DDR2- SDRAM. Two quad-port Intel PRO/1000GT and one Broa dcom NetXtreme II BCM57 08 (onboard) were used for the network.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark environment TX150 S6 with Xeon X3220: 60 × PRIMERGY BX300 2 x Pentium III 933 MHz 1 GB RAM 2 x Broadcom NetX.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 TX150 S6 with Xeon X3360: 80 × PRIMERGY BX300 2 x Pentium III 933 MHz 1 GB RAM 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme (on board) Windo.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 StorageBench Benchmark description To estimate the capability of disk subsystems Fujitsu Te chnolog y Solutions defined a benchmark cal led StorageBench to compare the different storage systems con nected to a s ystem.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Measurement scenario In order to obtain compar able measurement results it is im portant to perform all th e m easurements in identica l, repro- ducible environ ments.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark results The PRIMERGY TX150 S6 is equipped with controllers from the “Modular RAID” family. The variet y of the RAID solu- tions enables the user to choose the ri ght controller for his appl ication scenario.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 the shorter latency times. H ere again the RAID 0 array ac hiev es alm ost twice the write throughp ut through parallel ac - cesses, as compared with the other two configurations.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 LSI MegaRAID SAS 1068 Below is a comparison of the performa nce of various hard disk t ypes with the LSI MegaRAID SAS 1068 controller. The controller does not have a c ontroller cache.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 The following diagram shows that for rando m access with 67% reads the disk cache also plays an important role in im- proving throughput. An increase in throughput of up to 30% was achieved for the SAT A hard disk with 8 KB blocks.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 The following graphic s hows that during random acc ess in RA ID 1 the combination of the “W rite-back” and “Disk cach e enabled” options has a dec isive influence on throughput.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 When the onboard SATA ICH9R controller is compared with the LSI MegaRAID SAS 1068 contro ller, it is evident that both controllers offer roughl y the same performance when measurements are carried out with the same SAT A hard disks and optimum cache settings.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark environment All the measurements presen ted here were performed with the hardware and software components listed be low. Component Details Server PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Operating system Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Ed ition Version: 5.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 OLTP-2 Benchmark description OLTP stands for Online Tr ansaction Processing. T he OLTP-2 benchmark is bas ed on the typical a pplication scen ario of a database sol ution.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 O L T P-2: P R IM E R G Y TX150 S6 75.05 64.54 62.38 50.32 20.07 43.06 46.50 0 25 50 75 10 0 12 5 15 0 17 5 Ce le ro n 440 1 c o r e 2 G H z 800 M H z F S B ½ M B L2 - c ac he 35 Wa tt Pent i um D C E2 1 4 0 2 c or e s 1.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Benchmark environment Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise x64 Edition and database SQL Server 2008 Enterprise x64 Editio n. LAN Switch Storage: 2 x FibreCAT CX500 180 data disks FC RAID 0 (36 GB, 15 krpm) Clients: 2 x PRIMERGY Econel 200 with 2 x Xeon 3.
White Paper ⏐ Performance Report PRIMERGY TX150 S6 Version: 5.1, November 2008 Literature PRIMERGY Systems http://ts.fujitsu.com/primergy PRIMERGY TX150 S6 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id= af1d8493-dfbb-478e-89c9-9 2e917929234 PRIMERGY Performance http://ts.
デバイスFujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreの購入後に（又は購入する前であっても）重要なポイントは、説明書をよく読むことです。その単純な理由はいくつかあります：
Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreをまだ購入していないなら、この製品の基本情報を理解する良い機会です。まずは上にある説明書の最初のページをご覧ください。そこにはFujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreの技術情報の概要が記載されているはずです。デバイスがあなたのニーズを満たすかどうかは、ここで確認しましょう。Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreの取扱説明書の次のページをよく読むことにより、製品の全機能やその取り扱いに関する情報を知ることができます。Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreで得られた情報は、きっとあなたの購入の決断を手助けしてくれることでしょう。
Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreを既にお持ちだが、まだ読んでいない場合は、上記の理由によりそれを行うべきです。そうすることにより機能を適切に使用しているか、又はFujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreの不適切な取り扱いによりその寿命を短くする危険を犯していないかどうかを知ることができます。
ですが、ユーザガイドが果たす重要な役割の一つは、Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreに関する問題の解決を支援することです。そこにはほとんどの場合、トラブルシューティング、すなわちFujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 Torreデバイスで最もよく起こりうる故障・不良とそれらの対処法についてのアドバイスを見つけることができるはずです。たとえ問題を解決できなかった場合でも、説明書にはカスタマー・サービスセンター又は最寄りのサービスセンターへの問い合わせ先等、次の対処法についての指示があるはずです。
